DEWANGGA, PRAKOSA BUDI (2016) Register of Football Commentary: Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis. Skripsi,Fakultas Ilmu Budaya.
![[img]](http://eprints.dinus.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF Download (4Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (1071Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (169Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (262Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (288Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (298Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (229Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (219Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (627Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (747Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (574Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (303Kb) | Preview | |
| PDF Download (311Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
This thesis is entitled the Register of football commentary: Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis. The data is the final match of UEFA Champions League between Juventus Vs Barcelona on June 6th 2015. The main questions of this thesis are to find out the three meanings (Experiential, Interpersonal, and Textual) using the theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics by Halliday so the contextual description (register) of each meanings are discovered. The data are obtained by downloading the video, and then the transcript is created. The research design is descriptive qualitative, so the descriptions of the analysis are provided. The football commentary has 1841 clauses which 50 of those are minor clauses. In experiential meaning, the material process is the dominant because the commentators retell the events in the field without changing the process. In the interpersonal meaning, the declaratives are the dominant mood type since the football commentary is giving information. The Textual meaning is dominated by the Topical theme because the themes are mostly the players. In the contextual description, the football commentary is about two people who are reporting and giving opinion of the match with the purpose to make a good commentary of a remarkable match. This text is between commentators and audiences and commentator to commentator and is mostly in declaratives. Although the social distance between the commentators is minimal because the speech is familiar and elliptical, the relationship between them is unequal because the colour commentator (Andy) occasionally mentions the other commentator’s name (Clive) but Clive does not. The role of the language in the football commentary is constitutive because the language functions as the whole activity. The football commentary is monologue but some opinions make it has some dialogic qualities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Universitas Dian Nuswantoro > Fakultas Ilmu Budaya > Bahasa Inggris Z Literatur, Sastra > Bahasa Inggris |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ilmu Budaya |
| Depositing User: | Psi Udinus |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Sep 2016 14:50 |
| Last Modified: | 22 Sep 2016 14:50 |
| URI: | http://eprints.dinus.ac.id/id/eprint/20210 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
